Shareholder Resolutions

Back to most recent search results

Company: Mattel
Subject: Report on products manufactured by licensees
Year: 2008
Sector: Toys
Lead Filer: Marie-Claude Hessier-Grisel
Outcome: Vote: 5.6%

Shareholder Proposal

Whereas the shareholders request the Board of Directors to report yearly on the products manufactured by licensees and sold bearing Mattel's [*42] brands. Shareholders need to be reassured about the safety and the quality of those products as well as about the working conditions in which they are manufactured.

Supporting statement

According to Mattel 2007 Global Reporting Initiative report, Mattel also licenses its brands and trademarks to approximately 1000 licensees companies for the production of specialised consumer products such as apparel, software, durable goods and other children's products. The licensees independently manufacture these products in approximately 3000 contract factories around the world.

Shareholders cannot but be concerned by the above figures and by the potential risks they represent as manifested by the following cases.

In 2005, in a Mexican plant belonging to an American licensee, a case of an underage worker triggered worldwide media coverage, a demonstration in front of a "Target" in New York and the filing of a public communication with the Office of Trade Agreement Implementation by the trade union Frente de Trabajatores Vanguardia Obrera, with the support of the Washington Office on Latin America.

In 2006, Mattel recalled an American Girl jewelry with unacceptable high levels [*43] of lead. As stated by Mattel's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at the 2007 annual meeting, the jewelry was manufactured by a licensee. The jewelry was rated one of the worst products of the year by BusinessWeek.

In November 2007, the National Labor Committee published a report about the working conditions at a Chinese facility producing for Mattel such articles as Barbie electric guitars and keyboards, Barbie cassette players or Barbie "Hug N' Heal" Pet doctor sets for instance. Its conclusions are devastating: working time of over 80 hours a week, weeks on end without a rest day, overcrowded and overheated facility, renewed temporary contracts, workers cheated on overtime pay, primitive dormitories... Mattel claims that the facility is operated by one of its licensees.

Shareholders have greatly suffered from the numerous recalls of the past few months. Their faith in Mattel is shaken. The number of the licensees and their contract factories represents an obvious risk. Only yearly serious reports about the licensees will convince the shareholders to keep their faith in Mattel.